Back

A Pleistocene Ecosystem
by Wesley Gordon
page 25

Next 

How Old Are They?

How old are they Irvington mammals? The answer depends on which system of animal classification you use. In Figure 24, only the genera of mammals are listed , except for Canis (wolf), which will be explained later. Also, only land mammals are on the list, which excludes the seals.

Species are subdivisions of genera. Genera are older than species, families are older than genera, and orders are older than families. The Irvington peccaries, deer, camels, antelopes, and oxlike animals belong to an older that is more than 50 million years old. This order (Artiodactyla) originated at the beginning of the Eocene epoch. Families that evolved from the order of Artiodactyla are given below, with the approximate times of origin, from the most recent to the earliest.

Bovidae                      (oxlike animals)                        Miocene, Lower Middle

Antiocapridae            (antelopes)                                Miocene, Lower

Cervidae                    (deer)                                         Oligocene, Lower Middle

Tayassuidae              (peccaries)                               Oligocene, Lower

Camelidae                (camels)                                     Eocene, Upper

Throughout this book, the Irvington fauna is assigned to the Irvingtonian Mammal Age dated from about 1.3 million years ago. But in Figure 24, four different Mammal Ages are indicated for the twenty-three genera listed. This means that some of the genera found at Irvington survived through more than one Mammal Age. For example, three Irvington rodent genera (Citellus, Perognathus, and Peromyscus) are assigned to the Barstovian Mammal Age lasting from about 16 million to 11 million years ago.

A word about the only species noted in the tabulation, Canis dirus and Canis irvingtonensis: C. dirus has been found in great numbers in the Rancho la Brea pits of the Rancholabrean Mammal Age. Why is C. dirus assigned to the older, Irvingtonian Mammal Age rather than to be Rancholabrean? And C. irvingtonensis has been found only at Irvington. If this coyote should be found in even older deposits in the Hemphillian, for example would you reassign him?

A final comment on the tabulated data: Perhaps you noticed that three genera of land mammals are assigned to the Blancan Mammal Age but to neither the Early nor the Late Blancan. Paleontologists were unable to date these genera more precisely because the data were not sufficient.

   Back

 [Back to Index]

Next